Meditation

most religious people are always talking about seeking truth;and we are asking if truth can ever be sought after. In the idea of recognition — the idea that I find something I must be able to recognize it? Dose not recognition imply that I have already known it? is truth ‘recognizable’ –in the sense of its having already been experienced, so that one is able to say,” this is it”? So what is the value of seeking at all? Or if there is no value in it, then is there value only in constant observation ,constant listening?—which is not the same as seeking.

when there constant observation ,then there is no movement of the past.’To observe’ implies seeing very clearly; there must be freedom ,freedom from resentment,freedom from enmity,from any prejudice or grudge ,freedom from all those memories that one has stored up as knowledge, which interfere with seeing .when there is that quality that kind of freedom with constant observation —not only of the things outside but also inwardly –in what is actually going on,what then need of seeking at all?— foe it is all there ,the fact,the ‘what is’ ,it is observed.

But the movement we want to change ‘what is’ into something else ,the process of distortion takes place.observing freely ,without any evaluation ,without any desire for pleaure ,in just observing ,we see that ‘what is’ undergoes an extraordinary change; J.Krishanamurti.

observation,